The proposal from Polkassembly for a recurring payment from the Kusama Treasury primarily covers three categories – maintenance, operations, and human resources. The primary purpose is to support the continuous running and improvement of Polkassembly – an important platform in the Polkadot and Kusama ecosystem for on-chain governance.
As a platform enabling the discovery and participation in Polkadot and Kusama governance, it’s become an essential tool for proposers, token holders, and the wider community. This indicates a high likelihood of continuous usage and demand for Polkassembly’s services, thereby justifying the need for continued funding.
Polkassembly has completed several key milestones from their previous proposal, which showcases their ability to deliver on their commitments. This includes a number of upgrades and new features, such as improved documentation, new voting data categorization, and comment sentiment analysis. This demonstrable track record increases confidence in their ability to deliver on future commitments.
For the next quarter, the proposal outlines a range of new features and enhancements. These include user customization options, introduction of anti-spam measures, and platform integrations. This forward-looking plan indicates an active development cycle, with an emphasis on user experience and platform utility. This ongoing development is crucial to stay relevant and valuable to its users.
The proposal provides a comprehensive breakdown of their budget requirements. This includes both infrastructure costs (cloud services, email provider, documentation) and human resource costs (various development and management roles). The transparency and itemization of costs add credibility to the proposal and reflect careful planning.
However, there are a few areas that might require further clarification or attention:
While the proposal indicates the importance of Polkassembly, it would be beneficial to provide specific metrics demonstrating its usage and impact on the ecosystem. For example, data on the number of users, proposals discussed, votes cast, and other key usage statistics.
Also, while the breakdown of costs is comprehensive, justifications for each cost would strengthen the proposal. For instance, explaining the necessity of each role in the team, especially as they represent significant costs, would be beneficial. Similarly, clarifying why specific infrastructure services are chosen over potential alternatives could be helpful.
Overall, this proposal indicates a structured plan for the maintenance and development of Polkassembly over the next quarter. Given the track record of the team, the important role Polkassembly plays in the ecosystem, and the outlined future plans, this proposal demonstrates a significant potential for positive impact on the Polkadot and Kusama governance ecosystems.